Month: February 2025


  • T-Shirts And Tattoo

    by Teo Soh Lung

    The three people arrested were Saharuddin bin Saari (34 years old), Nick Lee Xing Qiu 18 and Hamizah binte Hamzah (56 years old).

    Saharuddin being a Malaysian, was reported to have been handed over to the Malaysian police after one month of detention.

    While Lee was issued with a detention order, Hamizah was released on a restriction order.

    NICK LEE XING QIU

    Does Lee deserve to be indefinitely detained?

    The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said that Lee is the third young person who was attracted by far right ideology. The other two who were 16 year olds, were released after one month of detention.

    What were the evidence against Lee that warrants a detention order? Was it because he is 18 or because he was found to have a tattoo and three t-shirts with alleged symbols of the far right?

    MHA’s statement contradicts itself when it claims that Lee viewed himself as a East Asian supremacist rather than a white supremacist. While alleging that he idolised Brenton Tarrant who singlehandedly killed and injured many Muslims in Christchurch, the ministry did not produce any evidence that Lee would carry out such atrocities in Singapore. Indeed, as in past cases, it admitted that:

    “Lee’s family members, teachers and schoolmates were unaware of his radicalisation, and there is no indication that he tried to influence them with his violent extremist views. At the point of his arrest, Lee’s attack ideations were aspirational and he had no timeline to carry them out. Investigations into Lee’s online contacts have not surfaced any imminent threat to Singapore.”

    I am not convinced that a tattoo which did not resemble fully a sonnenrad as the black centre is absent and three t-shirts, one of which has a TOTENKOPF constitute sufficient evidence to warrant the severe punishment of ARREST and INDEFINITE DETENTION under the ISA. How many of us had t shirts of Totenkopf and portraits of revolutionary leaders like Che Guevara and Nelson Mandela when we were young? During my undergrad days, Che Guevara was very popular.

    Has our education system collapsed to such a degree that schools are no longer capable to guiding a young person to the “right path”? Is the MHA making use of Lee to warn young people that surfing the net and watching so called far right videos is forbidden and may lead to arrest and indefinite detention under the ISA? Lee’s case is not even one of having to “nip in the bud” that the PAP likes to practise because he is a so called “lone wolf”.

    HAMIZAH BINTE HAMZAH

    The ministry alleged that Hamizah was “radicalised” because of HAMAS’s 7 October 2023 attacks against Israel. What is the meaning of being radicalised?

    It is alleged that she was active online and followed development of the Israel-Hamas conflict closely, opening many online accounts to replace posts and accounts that were removed.

    I think many of us who have a conscience have followed the terrible genocide online. We have given up mainstream media including BBC and CNN. Many of us followed posts from Gaza and Al Jazeera closely. Sharing of violent posts inevitably resulted in algorithms removing some of our posts. I have had such experience and occasionally, not being satisfied that a repost or remark was evil, I had appealed with positive results. I did not open several accounts like Hamizah but the fact remains that I have seen, commented and sympathised with Palestinians. And my sympathies with them have been open, including writing to the Israeli Embassy.

    Does pro Hamas posts and anti IDF comments equate to my being incline to taking up arms and joining them? I think most of us know that the days of James Puthucheary joining the Indian Nationalists and Chinese helping to construct the Yunnan road are over!

    Like Lee and so many others, the ministry itself concluded that “Hamizah had no attack plans nor intentions to engage in armed violence locally or overseas. … Hamizah’s family members were unaware of her radicalisation. She intentionally tried to keep her extremist views from them, for fear of censure.”

    As a former victim of the ISA, I am aware that press releases are one sided statements. The detainees do not know what is said about them. When they are released, the relief that they are no longer in indefinite detention is so great that they don’t even read such press releases. And if they read them, they know that any response may result in their re-detention as had happened to me and my friends in 1988.

    It is high time the Singapore government truly respect the rule of law. This colonial law made much worse by the PAP should be repealed immediately. Singaporeans deserve to be treated fairly. Should they be accused of wrong doings, free and open trial should be available to them and not clandestine hearings before the advisory board. Executive detention is not the way a civilised and prosperous country like Singapore should continue to practise after 60 years of independence.


  • Ong Lian Teng and The Barisan 13

     by Teo Soh Lung (first published 17 January 2022)

    Operation Coldstore was mounted by Singapore, Britain and the Federation of Malaya in the early hours of the morning of 2 February 1963. More than 133 leaders of opposition parties, trade unions and civil society were arrested and imprisoned without trial for exceedingly long years. Their disappearance from the political scene enabled the People”s Action Party {PAP) to govern Singapore with a super majority to this day.  

    Many of the victims of Operation Coldstore were accused of terrorism and having connection with the Communist Party of Malaya. They were tortured. We should never forget them and what the PAP did to them. The longest detained prisoners were Dr Lim Hock Siew (20 years), Ho Piao (18 years), Pak Said Zahari (17 years) and Dr Poh Soo Kai (17 years).

    The persons responsible for executing Operation Coldstore  will forever have their names tarnished in history, no matter what good they did for Singapore. The three key people were Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore’s first prime minister, Lord Nigel Douglas Hamilton Selkirk, British representative and Chairman of the tri-partite Internal Security Council and Tunku Abdul Rahman, the first and only chief minister of the Federation of Malaya. Having done the dastardly deed, Lord Selkirk and the Tunku did nothing to secure the release of those political detainees. They were left to rot in prison. Save for the occasional reminders by Amnesty International and a few other organisations, they were largely forgotten by Singaporeans and the world.

    Even though Operation Coldstore wiped out the most outstanding leaders of opposition parties and civil society, it did not fully satisfy the leaders of Singapore. Lee Kuan Yew and his colleagues – Toh Chin Chye, Goh Keng Swee, E W Barker and S Rajaratnam went on to conduct many mopping-up operations in order to deprive opposition parties from fielding candidates for the general election expected to take place that year. 

    Against all odds and unfair practices including kidnapping of potential candidates of the opposition parties, 13 members of Barisan Sosialis and Ong Eng Guan of the United People’s Party were elected in the general election held on 21 September 1963,  Lee Kuan Yew and his colleagues must have been too shocked for words. They swiftly moved into action and  mounted Operation Pecah on 8 October 1963. Three of the 13 elected Barisan members, namely, Lee Tee Tong, S T Bani and Loh Miao Gong were arrested and imprisoned for 18, 7 and 3 years respectively.  Two of the 13 escaped arrest by leaving the country and going into self-exile. They were Chan Sun Wing who was Lee Kuan Yew’s parliamentary secretary and Wong Soon Fong. Wong died in 2015 while Chan is still in Thailand. 

    The eight who took their seats in legislative assembly included Ong Lian Teng. He served as assemblyman for Bukit Panjang till 1966 when Barisan Sosialis chairman,  Dr Lee Siew Choh called for a boycott of the legislative assembly.  I am told that one of the main reasons for calling this boycott was  the assembly’s failure to convene meetings except for the passing of the annual budget. The eight members were instructed  to resign from their seats in the assembly. Their resignations led to the PAP retaining absolute power in the assembly until J B Jeyaretnam won Anson in the by-election in 1981. 

    This then is the sad history of Singapore. It was the use of detention without trial that wiped out the presence of an effective opposition in parliament, The opposition parties did not lack good and credible leaders. Indeed they were brilliant leaders with a conscience that led Lee Kuan Yew to fear them. To ensure that he and his party will always be in power, he imprisoned many of them for over a decade. He made sure that potential leaders who did not share his views were swiftly “nipped in the bud”. 

    Lee Kuan Yew also had another method of ensuring his long reign. He co-opted his opponents or their children. His press secretary James Fu was once arrested and detained for a few months without trial. He became his loyal press secretary. Today, his daughter, Grace Fu is a minister for sustainability and the environment. 

    Subsequent leaders of the PAP followed these two rules. They continued to nip potential bright young people who do not share the PAP’s style of government and co-opt their opponents or their children. Janil Puthucheary, son of Dominic Puthucheary who was also once detained is now a senior minister of state, Janadas Devan, son of former president Devan Nair who was disgraced and had to seek refuge in Canada is now director of the Institute of Policy Studies. 

    Co-opting Ong Ye Kung into the PAP fold is therefore nothing new.

    Those of you who are interested in the past can read this book “We Remember” which was published to commemorate the 50th Anniversary of Operation Coldstore. If you wish to purchase a copy (it is not in a pristine condition though unused) you can contact 2010Function8@gmail.com.